The Uk Budget Hotel Sector Literature Review Tourism Essay

The negative intension, which camped in the ideas of habitues of small-sized commercial hotels, besides known as budget hotels, is being substituted by a perceptual experience of affordability, proficiency and decency ( Parsons, G. , 2008 ) . The fleet switching market altering facets has positively affected the budget hotels fragment. This can be observed from the elation amongst local and international cordial reception operators of budget hotels. There is a chiseled form of germinating European vacationist over the way the cordial reception industry is taking ( Solomon, M. R. , 1992 ) . Budget hotels are in the patterned advance of being redefined with fresh theoretical accounts, inventions every bit good as schemes. With change overing outlook of clients and operators, contemporary budget hotels have to the full taken a U-turn with resolute contrast. Bing at a clip when mini-full service hotels are acknowledged as concern category, budget hotels have a healthy hereafter.

Budget hotels are compacted with simple installations for discerning concern travellers, therefore aiming a precise market division of middle-rank concern executives and price-sensitive corporate. Competitive cordial reception entities are sanely priced while holding good service, manner, and atmosphere, and they manifest professionalism ( Deloitte, 2004 ) . A really high growing for budget hotels is envisioned, nevertheless the state of affairs would be shrank due to shortage in supply of professional human capital. Nevertheless the brushs lay in front necessitate to be assumed as the spirit to prove and the ardor to outshine continue.

The UK Budget Hotel Sector

In the UK, the budget hotel sector is at a point of exponential growing ( McCaskey D. , 2000 ) .The branded budget hotel market remains to be controlled by barely two heavy participants. This is in mention to a new survey by TRI Hospitality Consulting. Table 1 below from Budget Hotels 2010 UK show that the taking trade name, Premier Inn, owned 41,511 suites by the terminal of 2009, gaining it a market portion of approximately 38 % ; The closest rival to Premier Inn was Travelodge, holding 27,010 suites by the stopping point of 2009, gaining Travelodge a market portion of about 25 % . Premier Inn and Travelodge hence control over two tierces of the budget hotel trade names market in the United Kingdom.

Table 1 UK Leading Budget Hotels Operators Source: Budget Hotels 2010 UK

Trade name

Number of Hotels

Number of suites

Premier Inn


41 511



27 010

Holiday Inn Express


12 464



7 173

Jury ‘s Inn


5 828

Innkeeper ‘s Lodge


2 652



2 212

Ramada Encore


1 947

Dayss In


1 834

Day Hotel


1 562

The branded budget sector in the United Kingdom is centered in merely a twosome of companies. However, the competition keeps on to wing high in the general hotel industry as the budget hotels take over the mid-market hotels and boarding houses. Jonathan Langston, the pull offing manager of TRI Hospitality Consulting agrees with this observation ( Parsons, G. 2008 ) . After 1993, the count of suites in budget hotel in the United Kingdom has risen by more than 10 times from 10,555 suites in 1993 to 109,528 suites at the stopping point of 2009. Although Premier Inn and Travelodge control the branded budget market, many new trade names have been coming up into the sector ( Tri Hospitality Consulting, 2010 ) .The most fortunate rival to Premier Inn and Travelodge has been Holiday Inn Express which presently runs 109 hotels holding 12,464 suites ( Tri Hospitality Consulting, 2010 ) . However, this is less than 50 % of the Travelodge ‘s figure of suites, and less than 30 % of Premier Inn.

Recession Impacts on the Budget Hotel Sector

The new survey, done by HotStats and issued by industry newssheet Hotel Analyst, as good makes it clear that while robust, the budget hotel sector has non remained unhurt by the economic downswing. Throughout 2009, returns per available room went down by 9.1 % , with occupancy falling by 5.9 % points to 67.8 % and rate keeping up better with a diminution of 1.1 % to ?50.97. The consequence of recession on the budget hotel sector was confirmed by Jonathan Langston when he said, “ The budget hotel market has genuinely been the hotel industry ‘s success narrative of the last decennary. While trading has suffered in the recession, new hotels are go oning to open, reflecting the long term viability of the section, ” ( TRI Hospitality Consulting, 2010, Pp. 1 ) .

The Budget Hotel Market Environment

The UK Budget hotel sphere began in 1985 with the inaugural of the Ibis at Heathrow, every bit good as Little Chef Travel Lodge. Ten old ages subsequently, there were about 400 budget hotels holding 28,500 suites in entire. As already mentioned in this paper, the budget hotel sector is exponentially turning, going progressively fleet ; Merrill Lynch forecast the budget hotel suites to increase from 40,000 in 1999 to 80,000 in 2003 taking a 20 % portion of the UK hotel market ( Deloitte, 2004 ) .

An geographic expedition survey by the Henley Centre ( 2000 ) Leisure in the New Millennium staged to the Joint Hospitality Industry Congress ( JHIC ) demonstrated that development in existent disposable income was increasing demand. This unrestricted spend had been originating at 2.6 % since 1995 and was visualized to rush up its rate of growing to 3.7 % Compound Annual Growth Rate by 2005. Leisure ingestion was switching from being looked upon as a luxury to going a necessity, in fact, about an simple homo right. The consequence of persons seeing leisure as portion of their run-of-the-mine running disbursals should be to cut down the industry ‘s cyclicality. Afore the budget hotel industry ‘s historical position as enduring from a hyperbolized rhythm, the pragmatism is that this industry has developed at a similar rate as the GDP since 1993 ( McCaskey D. , 2000 ) .

There is a batch of grounds to show that every dark budget hotels in the UK growingly affranchise the population into budget hotel usage. This must be a wanted displacement from the 1960s the clip at which fewer than 5 % of the population in the UK stayed in UK hotels, to the rates experienced today twenty-first Century, when more that 50 % of the UK ‘s population are active hotel users. Arguably, McDonalds was a main gas pedal in exciting the development of the UK eating-out market. McDonalds got rid of many of the barriers or suppressions to hotel use. Several strategic success grounds behind McDonalds ‘s QSCV ( Quality, Service, Cleanliness and Value ) are really relevant to budget hotels. To protect its name that could be taken advantage of, McDonalds ‘s lawyers had to discourage one concern from brand-marking its hotel merchandise McSleep ( McCaskey D. , 2000 ) .

With 80,000 suites and 80 % occupancy rate, estimates point that, budget hotels will suit more than 23,000,000 room-nights per twelvemonth ; in other words over 55 % of an full UK PLC demand. Kleinwort, B. ( 1996 ) figures demonstrate that back in 1995, UK PLC hotels gave 31.35 million room darks on sale. Consequently, these freshly Lodge formats holding low cost base have become a major challenge to two-thirds of the star conventional hotels which incline to holding relatively high costs reinforced into their operations and per Se, lack the malleability to promote their operation to four-star degrees, or to cut down costs to authorise them to bind Lodge monetary values. McCaskey, D. ( 2000 ) depicted budget hotels as a more and more hungry Pac Man as they cut a strip through the current industry.

Similar volatile addition in lodge installation in the United States from the mid ’60s to the late ’70s left many of the US ‘s distrait mid-market hotels in confusion. In the air, Governmental deregulating engendered the development of low cost air hoses, a move that served to give rise to the rapid terminal of Pan Am and TWA. Deregulation is at present in full batch in the United Kingdom and Europe with a extremist diminishing consequence on costs and subsequent grosss in both air hose and hotel industries. In the United States, the roadsides and urban sprawl are now full of supererogatory and peripheral Lodge belongingss constructed all through their roar old ages while some companies such as Red Roof Inns and La Quinta still record go oning success every twelvemonth ( McCaskey, D. , 2000 ) .

The Battle for Market Share

The budget hotel market has all the characteristics of the growing stage in the product/service life rhythm, doing it an ideal. The selling processes normally associated with the growing stage are:

The attacks which promote resilient trade name trueness ;

The attacks which reinforce market portion:

The attacks which improve a competitory position and underscore the differentiated benefits.

The selling activities of Travel Inn trade name, owned by Whitbread Hotel Company, stand out to clearly represent the above three. Travel Inn trade name has been so orchestrated to cut down the hazard of a negative client experience and has built a permanent value. Travel Inn conforms to all the criterions for categorization as a Leadership Brand, ranked beside other trade names including Coca-Cola, Volvo, Disney, every bit good as Tesco. In other words, Travel Inn and the other four live a kind of Total Brand Management lacking in other organisations. Other budget hotels besides need to prosecute similar position. The exemplified companies and Travel Inn have a doggedness that communicates all that they do for everybody to cognize what they can outdo make for the trade name. To confirm this return, Travel Inn competitory advantages have been examined utilizing the ‘Seven Characteristics of Leadership Brands ‘ theoretical account ( Tilley, C. , 1999 ) . The Seven are the common elements to be found in all taking trade names ; they are the ways by which trade names on a regular basis and systematically bear their promise.

Travel Inn is the outstanding market leader in the mushrooming budget hotel industry ; achieving 86 % room occupancy, across its 250 mercantile establishments, observing that every freshly opened Travel Inn operates for about three old ages before it additions about maximal incursion in its home-grown country. This dilutes Travel Inn ‘s general mean group tenancy. This budget hotel takes another three old ages to construct its regular clientele base. Consequently, Alan Parker ‘s, Hotel Company ‘s M.D. ( Parker, A. , 2000 ) statement that a great figure of Travel Inns constantly performed at mid-90 % occupancy, can be said of being bold every bit good as true.

It is apparent that Travel Inn is making what others are non making in order to successfully stay competent. For case in 1999, Travel Inn recorded a astonishing 78 % repetition business. Further analysis of Travel Inn ‘s figures staged that 77 % of its clients stayed double or more throughout a twelvemonth. In the interim, 33 % of the budget hotel ‘s clients stayed over 21 darks per annum twelvemonth while more than 15,000 stayed every individual dark ( Tri Hospitality Consulting, 2010 ) . In contrast to other UK budget hotels, Travel Inn finds another competitory advantage on booking ; Travel Inn has a system by which its habitue clients are able to book farther and further beforehand to procure their infinites.

Competitive Advantage

Success factors held by one budget hotel can be adopted by another. Travel Inn does a figure of things that place it at a better topographic point to successfully vie in the market. In mention to Travel Inn, the following schemes have been found to assist budget hotels in viing successfully for market portion:

1. Competitive budget hotels influence the behaviors of their clients alternatively of following conventions and markets ; they create clients.

It is a pattern and tradition in the hotel sector to come up a sophisticated rate of price reductions. These price reductions may be related to the volume of concern and booking period among others. This scheme is meant to keep and bring forth demand to do the most of occupancy and monetary value. However, some budget hotels run without these inducements abs they still make it in competitory concern. This could connote that there are factors other than this that topographic point such trade names on a competitory border. For case, Travel Inn does non offer such price reductions ; it neither pays travel agent committees. Equally much as these are radical goings from the budget hotel industry norm, Travel Inn still out-performs the business norms for the budget hotel sector. Travel Inn ‘s AARR ( mean achieved room rate ) without price reductions is the concatenation ‘s rack rate.

2. Competitive budget hotels effectively make a significance that is more than merely a map of the merchandise or service. The best significances are grounded on deeply felt human demands.

A research study on June 29, 2009 by Guy Parson, the Director of Marketing at Travel Inn, indicated that Travel Inn was more welcoming compared to Holiday Inn Express or Travel Lodge. The study besides confirmed the guesss that Travel Inn was the first option in inexpensive adjustment. Very encouraging client satisfaction studies every bit good as enigma shopping rates were being attained throughout Travel Inn and were constantly supervised. From this quantitative and qualitative research it was learnt that clients genuinely enjoyed their Travel Inn suites that were new and lively ( Parsons, G. , 1999 ) .

Travel Inn has a mandatory entire redevelopment after every three old ages, up to and including the bed. Obviously, there are other budget hotels which are siting on a similar competitory border. For case, on September 10, 2009, David Michels ( 2000 ) gave a brief life in which he stated that among his first projects instantly after taking over every bit Chief Executive of the disruptive Stakis Hotel Group was to do a petition to a bank to enable him to purchase 4,000 new beds for the hotel. Michels, D. , ( 2000 ) acknowledged that the move helped Stakis recuperate. Michels said, “ We are after all in the slumber concern, it would look that one of the major constituents in doing this a enjoyable experience is often ignored ” ( Michels, D. , Pp. 3 ) . From this proceeding, Paul Slattery ‘s ( 1995 ) analysis established that the spread between UK hotels PLC and unquoted houses is day-to-day broadening while the torturing battalions of independent budget hotels deteriorate into slums.

How Budget Hotels Achieve Competitive Advantage

Still utilizing Travel Inn as an illustration, this paper now focuses on how the most successful budget hotels in the UK have achieve a competitory border.

1. Leadership budget hotel trade names stand for intending everything that they do

Harmonizing to McCaskey, D. ( 1999 ) , the Travel Inn line of onslaught in relation to pricing is wholly ethical. Leadership budget hotel trade names take a pluralist line, such as an feeling that a company ‘s public presentation ought to be looked at in a much more pluralistic mode than merely by the bottom line. Such budget hotels often go beyond the minimum demands of Corporate Governance. These budget hotels ‘ policy is an illustration of good pattern. Given occupancy figures and the important sum or deflected demand, Whitbread could maximise its monetary value easy. Notwithstanding, Whitbread stands for the monetary values which are conventional, competitory, widespread, logical and carnival, which makes it to easy pass on the monetary values throughout its affiliates.

There are merely three categories of monetary values in the UK budget hotel industry ; Roadside, Metro ( in City Centre ) and Capital ( in London ) . However, leading budget hotel trade names carry out monetary value research to see that the monetary values are in line with client value. It is believed that many of Whitbread ‘s rivals merely follow Whitbread ‘s lead. Though the pricing warfare has for a long clip successfully invaded the unfair pricing in retail banking, super-marketing and automobile distribution, there are nevertheless excessively many dubious patterns in the UK ‘s budget hotel industry ( McCaskey, D. , 1999 ) . These questionable traditions comprise of:

Hyperbolic rack rates ;

‘Bait and Switch ‘ advertising publicities ;

Single-room addendums, and ;

‘Over-Riding Commissions ‘ ( kick-backs given to agents/ jobbers and their staff.

Given the contemporary consumer rights desired order of concern, the four questionable patterns will inescapably be disclosed.

2. Leadership budget hotel trade names are steady and expressive in every aspect of their communicating

This scheme ensures understanding. Whitbread ‘s recent innovative Television publicity to the full conforms to this attack. A redirect examination survey staged in April 2000 affirmed that the intents set for this Television commercial were outmatched. The research ‘s results demonstrated that:

“ aˆ? Spontaneous consciousness had risen from 12 % in April 1999 to 26 % in May 2000.

aˆ? Prompted consciousness had risen from 67 % in April 1999 to 82 % in May 2000.

aˆ? New logo acknowledgment rose from 17 % in April 1999 to 51 % in May 2000.

aˆ? Over the run period, there was a 16.5 % addition in Cardinal Reservation calls

aˆ? Over the twelvemonth at that place had been a 99 % addition in e-mail petitions and a 900 % addition in Web Site visitants. The site should take synergistic engagements shortly. ”

( Whitbread Marketing Department August, 2000, Pp. 12 )

The Whitbread ‘s staff enchiridion on the other manus captures the consequence of the trade name which is apportioned among squad participants. These foreshortened infusions from Whitbread ‘s staff enchiridion are a theoretical account of what ought to be carried out by other UK budget hotels. The book provinces:

aˆ? Dare to care ;

Budget hotel staffs need to demo considerateness, regard client as particular so as to guarantee that the trade name transcends what is expected.

aˆ? Keep it simple ;

Budget hotel staffs should non over-complicate affairs ; Whitbread ‘s staff are informed that being informal helps them to pass on crush barriers.

aˆ? Right first clip ;

Budget hotel staffs ought to be passionate about the industry criterions.

The so Whitbread ‘s CEO David Thomas ( 2000 ) got this Right First Time impute right with an case helping as a lesson for the budget hotel sector. Mr. Thomas said that Most of the budget hotel sector needs uninterrupted investing in people. He said, “ This is an country where I believe we most often shoot ourselves in the pes. Puting a natural recruit with small or no preparation and, no experience, in forepart of a client is inexcusable. In the terminal this is the most expensive option to take – because we so have to happen more natural recruits and more clients, because the experience demeans them both, ” ( Thomas, D. , 2000, Pp. 7 ) . Thomas ( 2000 ) continued to state that by the budget hotels industry criterions, Whitbread had relatively a low staff turnover.

Harmonizing to Mr. Thomas, the investing of budget hotels in preparation and betterment, and competitory wage and considerations, are critical factors in the hereafter of the budget hotel industry. These tools of the trade, Mr. Thomas said, shape the hereafter of this industry.

3. Leadership budget hotel trade names are dynamic, constantly following to run into new demands and remain pertinent

In a 1998 trade name re-launch, Project Catapult, Guy Parsons ( 1999 ) clearly redefined the trade name proposition. In his address, Parsons suggested a figure of things that ought to be done by UK budget hotels that wish to hold a crisp competitory border. Parsons proposed that UK budget hotels need to hold a changeless dialogue between the hotel and its clients. A wining UK budget hotel in footings of competitory border should hold the undermentioned features:

It should suit its general mission statement ;

It is should be grounded in fact, and at that place should turn out to back up it ;

It should hold a good tonic tantrum in line with the most recent research findings ;

It should propose the audacity and assurance of being a market leader

It should province its attending for internal motive

It should province its clear focal point refering communicating

It should bear in head that monetary value is non the centre though value should still be

The UK budget hotel harmonizing to Parsons, G. ( 1999 ) should utilize the above steps to pull their competitory schemes.

Budget Hotels ‘ Social Functions to Achieve Competitive Advantage

Leadership Budget Hotel trade names have societal duties

Harmonizing to Whitbread ‘s Chief Executive, David Thomas ( 2000 ) , during The Joint Hospitality Industry Congress at the Gloucester Millennium Hotel, leading trade names hold beliefs, places and, behavior which earn the regard of the people outside the trade name. A few old ages before 2000, Travel Inn had been criticized by some participants in the budget hotel industry, and by a good figure of metropolis market analysts, for losing the opportunity of doing short-run net incomes in Travel Inn. The analysts attributed the cause to holding one national monetary value that Travel Inn applied each throughout the hebdomad. After Travel Inn sharpened its schemes, Travel Inn it has since developed to go among the UK ‘s biggest branded hotel ironss holding 250 hotels and 12,500 suites. As tabled before on this paper, Travel Inn ‘s occupancy is increasing across the trade name relation to its returns. Thomas bases Travel Inn ‘s success on a win-win attack between the trade name and its clients.

2. Budget Hotel trade names ‘ leading is earned non given

Leadership budget hotel trade names percolate the whole constitution ; they are non simply the organisation ‘s label. Leadership budget hotel trade names serve as a life theoretical account of how good to transport on, what activity to make to accomplish the best, and how to execute into the hereafter. Other UK budget hotel trade names need to recognize the groundbreaking and advanced schemes developed by Whitbread. In its startup, Travel Inn yipped that it was set to get down up a wholly innovative and path-breaking strategy which would play a function in farther distinguishing it, give its trade name the first mover position every bit good as maintain its purpose as The UK ‘s Favorite topographic point to Stay. Successfully, Travel Inn has lived to populate its induction dream. This therefore serves as an illustration to other UK budget hotel trade names ; they should put their ain social ends, live by them so as to put them in a better competitory place ( Parsons, G. , 1999 ) .

The Future for the UK Budget Hotel Sector

Mr. Robert C. Hazard, President Choice Hotels, in the twelvemonth 1994 was quoted stating, “ the period 2000-2010 will be the most competitory in the history of the UK Budget Hotel industry… ..every Lodge must go more market driven, bettering its merchandise to make a alone, sustainable competitory advantage and a perceptual experience of greater value amongst its invitees ” ( Porter, M. , 1996, Pp. 61 ) . Porter argued that strategic advantage may be earned via singularity. He said, “ A company can merely surpass challengers if it can set up a difference that it can continue. It must present greater value to clients or make comparable value at lower cost or make both ” ( Porter, M. , 1996, Pp. 67 ) . Porter besides acknowledges that through distinction, arithmetical productiveness leads to superior step and lets a company to bear down even higher normal monetary values per units. It besides makes a company acquire more efficient consequences even in lower than normal costs per unit and all this enable a company to accomplish a virtuous circle.

Today, the speedy development phase in lodging services decelerates as the market attains full development and becomes concentrated. Predictions place this development at an infiltration that is about between 20 % and 25 % in the hotel market in United Kingdom. The anticipations have mentioned of import presence in the developments at the roadsides, in the outskirts, in inner-cities and besides in London. The hotel market in UK will be perceptibly defined by monetary value and quality groupings, from the super- budget to upper-market economic systems. Most hotels that will be the mid-market subscribers in the current bunch include, Holiday Inn Express, Premier Lodge, Travel Inn and Travel Lodge. These hotels are expected to hold realized their strategic and web aspirations and to hold besides settled most present affairs such as the telephone installations in the hotel sleeping rooms, the excess conference and meeting suites. These betterments should be carefully examined so as to run into the existent client requirements.

Increase in competition is expected over the old ages and growing in supply is besides expected to excel the growing in demand. The stronger participants are bit by bit expected to conflict one another alternatively of merely taking concern from the lesser participants as soon ( Pricewaterhouse, 2010 ) . In 1998, the Vice President of Holiday Inn Express, Mr. Shane Harris remarked that, “ The budget sector is over supplied with non-branded, hapless quality, inconsistent hotels. These will be overtaken by the branded budgets which are presently undersupplied, ” ( Harris, S. , 1998, Pp. 21 ) . The celebrated betting and control organisation, Pricewaterhouse Coopers acknowledge Brands as the big constituents of an organisation ‘s immaterial worth ( July 2000 ) . Pricewaterhouse Coopers besides act upon trade names capableness to better stakeholder worth with trademark tactics in explicating competitory benefit. The branding thought has changed from merchandise advertisement to service advertisement. Corporate trade names should steadily mirror the capablenesss of the peculiar organisation.

Table 2 Literature Review Matrix











Kleinwort, B



Parker, A.

Parsons, G.

Porter, M.


Slattery, P.

Solomon, M

Tilley, C.