Comparing and Contrasting Sonnet 130 and Ars Poetica Essay

“Change what you see by altering how you see” ( Huie ) . This quotation mark relates to “Sonnet 130. ” by William Shakespeare and “Ars Poetica. ” by Archibald Mac Leish. Sonnet 130 is about the mistakes of his kept woman. but realizes by the terminal of the verse form. that his love is all that affairs. This adult male did non see his kept woman as an ugly adult female. but alternatively saw her as person whom he loves in a heartfelt way. In a different manner. Ars Poetica states that “a verse form should non intend. but be” ( MacLeish 23 ) . Peoples who read a verse form may seek to construe its existent significance. but there is truly nil to construe. A verse form should merely intend what it says. Although both “Sonnet 130. ” by William Shakespeare and “Ars Poetica. ”by Archibald MacLeish have similar subjects such as simpleness. and similar devices such as utilizing imagination to depict beauty and nature. they have different significances. since one verse form seems to anticipate a considerable sum from a kept woman. and the other verse form expects nil of a verse form.

One similarity between “Sonnet 130” and “Ars Poetica” is their subjects of desiring nil but simpleness in a verse form and a kept woman ( stated in the last pair ) . and love and worship. When reading “Sonnet 130” one might believe that this adult male spends his clip kicking about his kept woman. and clearly dosen’t love her. nevertheless. by the terminal of the verse form he realizes that his kept woman may non be beautiful. but their love is beautiful. and that is all that affairs. “And yet. by Eden. I think my love as rare” ( Shakespeare 13 ) . In “Ars Poetica. ” MacLeish explains that “a verse form should be wordless” ( 7 ) and “a verse form should be motionless in time” ( 9 ) . One might be confused by what the verse form is really seeking to state. but he ended the verse form by stating. “a verse form should non intend. but be” ( 23 ) . which was a clearer statement.

As was said before. a verse form is non something people should over analyze. it should merely do you experience the manner it does. Almost ike a picture or sculpture. a verse form is non a mystifier. but a temper or a feeling. Both poems seem to hold different positions on what to anticipate from a mistress/poem. In “Sonnet 130. ” Shakespeare expects a great trade of things from his kept woman. There are 12 lines discoursing the letdown of his mistress’ eyes. lips. hair. cheeks. breath. voice. and how she walks. Lines such as her eyes “are nil like the sun” ( Shakespeare 1 ) . her lips are less ruddy than coral. and her hairs are like black wires turning on her caput. demo how displeased he is at these unattractive qualities. “Ars Poetica” is wholly different in this manner. MacLeish says. “A verse form should be tangible and mute” ( 1 ) . and “Dumb as old medallions to the thumb” ( 3 ) .

These words demonstrate how he believes that poesy should be different than what society expects them to be. He wants nil of a verse form. but merely believes that verse forms should be whatever they want to be. Another similarity between “Sonnet 130” and “Ars Poetica” would be that they both use imagination to compare beauty and nature. “Sonnet 130” used this device. to show the nature of beauty through imagination. “I have seen roses damask’d. ruddy and white. but no such roses see I in her cheeks” ( Shakespeare 5 ) . This compares his mistress’ cheeks to the beauty of a rose.

“Ars Poetica” has many lines that use imagination. one of which compares words to the flight of birds. “a verse form should be wordless as the flight of birds” ( MacLeish 7 ) . Both authors did an faultless occupation utilizing imagination to heighten the readers understanding and utilize descriptive words to do the verse form more beautiful and interesting sounding. “Ars Poetica” and “Sonnet 130” are similar in the manner that they both have a similar subject of simpleness and worship. “Ars Poetica” desiring a verse form be in it’s simplest footings and desiring it to intend merely merely what it says.

Although in “Sonnet 130” Shakspere does look to anticipate a batch from a kept woman. he states at the terminal of the verse form. that he wants nil more than the kept woman he has. Another similarity is that they both compare beauty and nature. This device was used strictly to lure the reader. and do it easier for the reader to understand. One indispensable difference between both verse forms. would be that in “Ars Poetica. the poet strongly believes that a verse form should be “wordless” and simple. about careless. However. in “Sonnet 130. ” Shakespeare spends most of the verse form taking about his mistress’ unattractive qualities and seems quite expectant of a figure of things. Analyzing these cardinal similarities and differences are what assist the reader understand the verse form in a more analyitical manner.